Creationist lies carbon dating

14 Jun

The level of atmospheric Radiometric dating in general, of course, poses a huge problem for people who believe that the universe is 6000-odd years old.

A favorite tactic of Young-Earthers involves citing studies which show trace amounts of Indeed, this results from a unique decay mode known as "cluster decay" where a given isotope emits a particle heavier than an alpha particle (radium-226 is an example.) This fact is extremely inconvenient to young-earthers, and creationist literature, accordingly, usually does not mention it.

• Evolution and morality • Evolution and religion • Evolution conspiracy • Evolutionism • Firmament • Galactocentricity • Geomagnetism • Global flood • Haji Yearam • Hanzi of Genesis • Historical and operational science • Hydroplate theory • In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood • Intelligent design and academic freedom • Irreducible complexity • Leap second • List of creationist claims • Lunar bukkake hypothesis • Lunar dust • Lunar radioactivity • Lunar transient phenomena • Microevolution and macroevolution • Noah's Ark • Noah's Ark sightings • Orchidaceae • Peanut butter argument • Proof of the inconsistency of arithmetic • Recession of the Moon • Rotation of the Earth • Science doesn't know everything • Science was wrong before • Wedge Strategy • White hole cosmology • Baraminology • Didit fallacy • Epic of Gilgamesh • Flood geology • Fossil sorting by the global flood • Global flood • Global flood chronology • God's Love • Grand Canyon • Haji Yearam • Hydroplate theory • Lake Agassiz • Life and the global flood • Lunar bukkake hypothesis • Noah • Noah's Ark • Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study • Noah's Ark sightings • Noah (film) • Parasites during the global flood • Adam and Evolution: A Scientific Critique of Neo-Darwinism • Appel à la beauté • Argument from beauty • Argument from design • Argument from fine tuning • Argument from first cause • Ask Darwinists • Banana argument • Biological Information: New Perspectives • Cdesign proponentsists • Darwinism Under The Microscope: How Recent Scientific Evidence Points To Divine Design • Evolution Under the Microscope: A Scientific Critique of the Theory of Evolution • Expelled: Leader's Guide • Explanatory Filter • Eye • Falsifiability of creationism • Flagellum • Flowers of asexually-reproducing plants • Intelligent design • Intelligent design and academic freedom • Irreducible complexity • John A.

Davison • Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False • Moody Institute of Science • Polonium halos • Providence Lost: A Critique of Darwinism • Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design • Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design • Suboptimal design • The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin • The End of Darwinism • The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories • The Origin of Human Nature: A Zen Buddhist Looks at Evolution • The Wonders of Creation Reveal God's Glory • Thomas Nagel • Academic Freedom Act • Edwards v.

16.000 years by the way is still 10,000 years before your God supposedly created the Earth." Amy M 12/11/01 My response: I explain the limits of Carbon dating below.

One thing you might want to ask yourself though, is how do you know it is millions of years old, giving an "incorrect" date (one that you think is too young) or if it actually is only a few thousand years old.

Meyer • Teach the controversy • Texas Board of Education • Text of The Wedge Strategy • Text of the Santorum Amendment • Wedge Strategy • Wedgie strategy • What is intelligent design?

• 12 Arguments Evolutionists Should Avoid • Affirmations and Denials Essential to a Consistent Christian (Biblical) Worldview • Andrew Snelling • Answers Research Journal • Answers in Genesis • Answers in Genesis-Creation Ministries International's Statement of Faith • Answers in Genesis Dawkins interview controversy • Ark Encounter • Atheists Outline Their Global Religious Agenda • Bodie Hodge • Creation Ministries International • Creation Museum • Hanzi of Genesis • Jason Lisle • Ken Ham • Lists of creationist scientists • Answers Research Journal • Answers Research Journal volume 1 • Answers Research Journal volume 2 • Answers Research Journal volume 3 • Answers Research Journal volume 4 • Answers Research Journal volume 5 • Answers Research Journal volume 6 • Answers Research Journal volume 7 • Answers Research Journal volume 8 • Alpha-Omega Institute • Andrew Snelling • Brian Thomas • Danny Faulkner • David A. Morris • Institute for Creation Research • Jason Lisle • Jeffrey Tomkins • Jerry Bergman • John D.

The samples of bone were blind samples.""Of course carbon dating isn't going to work on your Allosaurus bone. So I would expect to get some weird number like 16,000 years if you carbon date a millions of years old fossil.Unbiased science changes the theory to support the facts.They should not change the facts to fit the theory.What would happen if a dinosaur bone were carbon dated?- At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Scientists dated dinosaur bones using the Carbon dating method.